writing the scarce(rare) texts

Write the unwritten not the unknown

Today i just happen to hear that Google will rate your blog more if you write different stuff and it made good sense to me.but i also acknowledge that fact that we should rather change our style of thinking accordingly .I believe that i don't need to explain you why does so, quite simply it is the best search engine and it would rather different stuff to pop up front rather than filling the whole first page with the same content spelled differently.

So lets optimize this stuff,

case 1

this is my true incident in my bibliophilophist.blogspot.in page ,there i wrote about two Indian authors and an international author,

First the Indian authors , 1)chetan bhagat 2)Ravi subramanian

the earlier is often said to the "best seller of modern Indian literature" ,sure he is .he has pulled numbers from nowhere and has literally created a new market.The latter is a best seller too,but not a trend setter as chetan , the logic being simple ,he writes to specific audience and not to the mass.

i personally love the latter and always had a wish to write on him as he is my personal favorite of all time  but thought that it wont go well but still went with it.i was really shocked to see the latter getting more views than the former , that too given the fact that i have published the latter first (if you don't understand this specific logic ,please visit read my last post )

if i go by the numbers , Chetan has 2.3million twitter follower against ravi's 2356 followers then when i came across this logic , i got it clearly.it is quite possible that many people would have mentioned "chetan or his books in the social media or even blogs, making my content not unique.i also want to make it sharp that writing rare stuff doesn't mean that you have to write 'unwanted' 'nobody-cares' stuff,in the above case we may have like you writing something similar to 'kakavoka,the unknown novel of Assam tribal ' ,because it has to have some searching or have to in news trend ,simply in the INTERNET but that also have to deal with the sample size of the content , if i just apply my former explanation ,when Dan brown is the most written in internet  and is also having the most 'presence' on the internet,the result number would something near 5 , but the sample size factor , more people around get to  read Brown than Chetan , that's how. 

confusing?

in common english ,have common sense, how will you think when you know that google thinks?with that note i'll extend this ideology in my next post.

see y'a real soon